# Select indicators and metrics

For reassessment, indicators and metrics from the baseline assessment are pre-populated in the platform by default and should be reviewed carefully before making any changes. Indicators and metrics selected for reassessment must be used exactly as defined in the baseline—any changes would compromise comparability over time.&#x20;

If the assessment team wishes to alter an indicator or metric, or introduce new ones, these will not be considered part of the reassessment. Instead, they will be treated as new baseline measurements, as there would be no direct basis for comparison with previous results.

For definitions of the types of indicators and metrics as well as guidelines on the initial selection process, refer to the [baseline assessment guidelines](https://docs.landscale.org/step-b/select-indicators-and-metrics).

<figure><img src="/files/vaIlsNfClapiGG9bqH97" alt=""><figcaption><p>When comparing indicators between assessments, a red X indicates the indicator was not selected, while a yellow checkmark indicates it was selected.</p></figcaption></figure>

Since indicators drive the selection of associated metrics, the assessment team must first choose the indicators to reassess. For each selected indicator, the associated metrics should then be [reviewed for data availability](/reassessment-guidelines/step-b/select-data-resources-and-address-data-gaps.md) to ensure they can be reliably measured.

If, after reviewing available data sources, a metric cannot be assessed due to a lack of updated and suitable data, it may be marked as 'data deficient' on the section comments. Metrics with this status do not require a result input during the reassessment. To support future assessments, the assessment team should consider how this data gap might be addressed—such as through targeted studies, additional research, or alternative data collection methods.

{% hint style="info" %}
**Recommended stakeholder input**

Engaging stakeholders in the indicator and metric selection process is highly recommended—especially when identifying the most critical indicators for tracking performance over time. These should align with the landscape initiative’s sustainability goals and ongoing efforts.

Stakeholders often possess valuable knowledge about data available for the landscape. When engaging stakeholders on metric selection, it may be efficient to also inquire about potential data sources before conducting an extensive data search. If some datasets are already known to the assessment team, it is helpful to seek feedback from stakeholders regarding these data sources.&#x20;

The initial list of data can be drawn from the global datasets identified in the LandScale Data Resources Library (accessible through the LandScale platform) and from the assessment team's knowledge of local and national data. Stakeholder input can be gathered using various means, such as workshops, online documents, or targeted feedback.
{% endhint %}


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://docs.landscale.org/reassessment-guidelines/step-b/select-indicators-and-metrics.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
